Last weekend my DS1019+ decided, for some unfathomable reason, to stop working after I took it out of the closet, dusted it and put it back, and I have feelings about it.

In fact, I’ve had them throughout the whole week, because it’s taken forever to get most of my home services up again.

Fortunately, my home automation and a few other things are spread among my Proxmox nodes, but I had a bunch of things running on that NAS, and I wanted to document what happened because someone else might have the same issues I did and end up here.

The machine booted up (power LED initially blinking, solid green status LED, disk activity almost immediately), but would not show up on the network.

Both LAN interfaces would be up, but issued zero packets. No DHCP requests, no link-local addressing, not even replies to arping (and yes, I knew the MAC addresses of the machine, because that’s the kind of thing I keep tabs on). I plugged in my MacBook and my MiniBook X on each interface, rebooted, and saw… nothing.

tcpdump saw nothing at all. I thought it might be some sort of OS glitch (which is why I tried both laptops), but no luck.

So I tried to reset it to factory configuration. You have two reset levels, the first of which only resets your admin password and network settings, the second has you reinstall the OS without losing data.

But nothing worked, and Synology’s tooling just couldn’t find the NAS or connect to it.

The first thing I did was set up Virtual DSM on borg to see if I could, in the direst of emergencies, access our off-site Azure backups. That sort of worked, but the experience was so fiddly that I was reminded of all of HyperBackup’s pitfalls in one fell swoop–most notably that I effectively need a Synology to get at that data, which is not something I want to rely on.

Yes, there is a HyperBackup desktop application. No, it did not work for me–it apparently expects you to download backup files from the cloud to your local machine, and I need to be able to directly restore files from Azure, period.

After filing a ticket with Synology about my unresponsive system, they sent me an AI-generated troubleshooting list, in the middle of which was a step I could not find anywhere in their online documentation: booting the machine without any disks.

That apparently also automatically reset settings (which is, in retrospect, weird, because it feels like something should be stored in the chassis for this kind of emergency), and I was finally able to discover it on the network, reset the admin password, reconfigure the network, etc.

So if you have the same symptoms, this might save your day. And, as it turns out, be the prelude to an entire week of pain, because mine spent the past five days or so grinding through data scrubbing. Because that is a thing it felt like doing, and I’ve been coping with the fallout since then–extremely slow access, very slow response times as I tried to double-check services and settings, etc.

First of all, all my Docker containers were gone. Container Manager, for some reason, does not preserve any settings in this scenario, and if I didn’t have Portainer installed and a copy of (most of) my stacks in Gitea, this would have been enough for me to never again run containers on a Synology.

As it was, I was able to point piclaw to the machine and have it reconstruct all critical services in a few hours (it would have been much faster if it wasn’t doing scrubbing). And, as it turns out, there was also enough residual info in the underlying Docker daemon itself to fill in most of the gaps.

But barring that, there were a bunch of things that made recovery a pretty stressful endeavor:

• The mobile apps (DS Finder and the like) were useless in finding or diagnosing the issue at every step.
• The web site did not list disk removal as a troubleshooting step (at least not that I could see, since it went straight into the dual-step reset procedure).
• The timing documented for holding the reset button for reset 1 (4 seconds) was not accurate. It was more like 20, and I feared for a moment I might end up triggering reset 2, which would require reinstalling the OS.
• Synology’s desktop tools are, to be brief, very poorly maintained and look like something out of the 90s, even down to the Windows look on macOS.

So even for an “appliance” NAS, the experience could be much better.

Resetting the configuration had zero impact on my data–at least so far as I can tell. Shares, users, all the regular stuff was preserved, and after a few glitches with cloud backups (because disk scrubbing made them fail overnight twice), everything seems in order.

But since the machine spent so long simultaneously scrubbing and swapping as I tried to restore services, it’s clear that I cannot rely on it for interactive use anymore.

Synology doesn’t really let me upgrade RAM on the thing (you sort of can, but it’s already capped at the maximum RAM the J4125 can officially support), so I’ve started removing stuff from it–most of the Docker services I’ve been running there for years are now moving into Proxmox microVMs or LXCs running elsewhere, and are either going to use the Synology as a “dumb” NAS and mount storage directly, or be backed up to it using Borg Backup Server (which is going to be the only new Docker container running on it).

I’ve already moved Portainer and Gitea off it, and having them run (even with very constrained resources) on separate microVMs in an N150 makes a world of difference–so much so that I have to wonder why I put up with the J4125’s slowness for years.

I set Proxmox to snapshot both VMs daily (and added a temporary direct-to-cloud restic backup), and am now slowly moving the rest. Or, rather piclaw is doing that. I had it draft a plan to group containers and create target VMs/LXCs, and the agent is now merrily rsyncing data and container configs out of the Synology.

After the dust settles, I am going to move all of my backups out of the Synology ecosystem–I currently rely on HyperBackup to back up my data to Azure, but the recovery attempt was so off-putting that I am going to look into using restic directly to Azure.

Backrest looks like a nice way to do that, with the added benefit that restic backups (which I have already been using for years) seem to work better with Azure storage tiering (and thus might even be cheaper in the long run).

The Ternus announcement got me thinking about the one thing I keep wishing Apple would build and almost certainly never will: a family-scoped AI assistant that actually works across all our devices.

I don’t mean a frontier model or a “reasoning engine”–just a competent, context-aware agent that understands my family as a unit. The shared calendar, the school schedules, the medication reminders, who’s picking up whom and when. The kind of thing that Apple Intelligence was supposed to be, except pointed at the problem that would actually matter most to the people who are already deep in the ecosystem and paying for it.

I am married with two kids. Between us we have more Apple devices than I care to count–and we are exactly the demographic Apple loves to put in keynote photos. And yet iCloud treats us as completely separate customers who happen to share a credit card. Family Sharing is a permissions layer bolted onto individual accounts, and it shows in every single interaction–shared photo libraries (still broken), purchase management (still confusing), screen time (still adversarial rather than collaborative). Twenty-four years of “digital hub” strategy, and this is where we are.

Here’s what a competent family agent could do without being creepy–and in most cases, without even needing to leave the device:

• Know that my son has a test on Thursday and hasn’t opened the revision material since Monday. A gentle nudge (to him), not a surveillance report.
• Track our medication schedule and ping people (or me, if an elderly relative misses a window) without turning into a clinical monitoring tool.
• Surface things on Apple TV that match what we actually watch, not what the recommendation engine wants us to try.
• Coordinate pickup times, grocery lists, meal plans–the sort of mundane family logistics that currently live in a group chat and three different apps.
• Make iCloud file sharing work the way a shared family folder should, rather than the absurd permissions mess it currently is.
• Do smarter photo sharing–not just a wholesale shared library, but understanding who’s took the photos, where and sharing only relevant stuff to family without it being an all-or-nothing proposition.
• Better family e-mail, better event handling, better package tracking across household members.

I also want it to let me keep my parents and in-laws in the loop. Most of the above also applies to extended family, especially if you have elderly parents who need help managing their medications, appointments, and social connections. A family agent could be a lifeline for them without being intrusive.

None of this is exotic. Apple already does the understated version of some of it–surfacing birthdays, suggesting contacts to call at specific times, the quiet little iOS touches that work well precisely because they don’t try to be clever. A family agent would just be more of that, but with understated functionality across the whole household instead of locked to a single Apple ID.

And none of it requires SOTA models, or selling out to Gemini. A 4B parameter model running on-device–the sort of thing I’ve been running on an ARM SBC for months–would handle the intent parsing and coordination.

The hard part isn’t the AI. It never was. It’s the will, the focus and the willingness to execute, and that’s where Apple has been asleep at the wheel for over a decade–and I am not going to hold my breath that Ternus will be the one to wake them up in things like APIs and interoperability that would actually make this possible by third parties.

They should have an absurd advantage here: they own the OS, the hardware, the sync layer, the health stack, the media stack, the calendar, the reminders. Nobody else even comes close to that vertical. And they’ve done nothing with it.

I know this is possible because I’ve been building something like it myself–a personal agent that fits in a single Go binary and a SQLite database, carries its own scripts and state, and runs on anything from a Raspberry Pi to a desktop. The TypeScript-based version already manages my homelab, files links to my wiki, coordinates across machines, and does it all with about 300MB of RAM (the Go version should take up 30).

I built this on the equivalent of a Raspberry Pi, but Apple can’t do it with a trillion-dollar platform because they won’t treat families as anything other than a billing construct.

Just to add insult to injury, I could do most of what I wanted if we were in the Google ecosystem. But on iCloud it’s impossible to access shared tasklists (or even anything else, really) with any sort of standard protocol and documented API. For Google (or even Outlook), most of it is accessible.

Every Apple equivalent is there, but they just refuse to connect them, or let anyone use them.

I know I’ve banged on this drum for years, but Apple has spent the better part of a decade systematically breaking OS automation, and they’ve done it so thoroughly that it’s hard to believe it’s accidental.

AppleScript is on life support. Automator was effectively killed. Shortcuts was supposed to replace both, and instead became an App Store for workflow fragments that nobody maintains and that break with every major OS update. The Shortcuts editor is still painful for anything beyond “open this app and do one thing”, and the integration points with third-party apps range from spotty to fictional.

On Android, you can set up Tasker automations that trigger on location, time, sensor data, app state, notification content, Bluetooth proximity–and chain them into workflows that persist across OS updates. On Windows, I have a piclaw instance that can drive the entire desktop via a Windows API extension. The gap between what those platforms allow and what Apple permits isn’t narrowing. It’s getting wider.

Shortcuts could have been the foundation for family automation. Instead, it’s a gallery of pretty icons.

I suspect the real reason is structural. Apple doesn’t think of families as a product category. They think of them as a collection of individual customers who happen to share a payment method. Every design decision reflects this: iPads are still single-user devices. iCloud storage is pooled, but grudgingly, and shared files live in a sort of no-man’s-land. App purchases are shared grudgingly, in a submenu of a submenu. Family Sharing is an afterthought, not a platform.

The only thing that Apple seems to care about (after iMessage) is that we can share what we are watching on Apple TV, which has been relevant in our family for exactly zero minutes since the feature launched.

And until someone at Apple decides that “a household of four using Apple devices” is a use case worth designing for rather than designing around, Siri will remain a single-user voice assistant that can’t reliably set a timer on the right HomePod.

With Ternus coming from hardware, I’d like to think there’s a chance he gets that a trillion-dollar ecosystem ought to handle a shared grocery list. But I’ve been hoping Apple would sort out family sharing since iCloud launched, so I’m not holding my breath here.

I’ve been mulling the UX arc I’ve been going through over the past couple of years, and I think it was mostly the same for everybody:

• Copy/paste into a chat web UI
• IDE with a chat sidebar (VS Code, Zed, etc.)
• TUI chat (Mistral Vibe, pi, Codex CLI, Claude CLI, etc.)
• Rich chat in a native app (Codex desktop, Claude desktop)
• Web chat with rich interactive widgets (piclaw)

Since I spend a lot of time on my iPad, piclaw’s web timeline has become my default–I can pop open the terminal or the editor at will, but coding is still a game of balancing drudgery with creativity, and the “creative” part works well in chat.

At least for me, using AI for my projects has been a matter of speeding up the review cycle. If you open a new chat thread for every feature or fix, going back to the editor takes you away from the flow–it’s much easier to have the model spew the changes in the chat, highlight the bits you want changed, and iterate directly in it.

And I’ve just realised, after adding iPad text highlighting and annotation support to the piclaw timeline (to make it easier to point out specific things to the model), that what I’m building is a Mathematica notebook for code.

I’m sure Stephen Wolfram would be delighted to be proven right, even if this paradigm isn’t really for everybody.

Of course, this scales poorly when refactoring and you have a zillion modified files, but other than refactors I am the kind of person who likes small, testable iterations and still looks at the code.

I also think that being able to scroll back up, fish out an older interaction and re-use it (or riff on it) is powerful, and what I am planning to do next is to inject an editor pane into the web chat to directly review and edit code inline–not as a separate tab, but as part of the conversation flow.

There’s something about this that irks my vim-addicted brain, of course, but it’s tantalising, and I quite enjoy sitting on the couch with my iPad after a long day in front of my desktop–and yes, using handwriting recognition to prompt it works great; I love living in the future.

Regular readers will know that I’ve spent most of the past two years shoehorning LLMs into single-board computers, partly as a learning exercise and partly because there are lots of local/”edge” applications where semantic reasoning (no matter how limited) and “interpretation” of sensor data are actually useful.

But now we’re at a point where running a decently useful open weights model on your laptop is entirely feasible.

This comes at what is possibly the worst point in our timeline, and after having started my own inference library and tried hacking away at @antirez’s brilliant hack within my meagre resources, I feel like a serious rift is developing between the “haves” who were lucky to get hardware on time (or can splurge multiple K of European Pesos on it) and the “have nots”.

The societal impact of the entire thing in the always hype-driven geek community is, of course, fascinating (especially since a very small number of people have a disproportionate amount of influence in this little echo chamber), and I sometimes feel like Jane Goodall observing packs of opinionated chimpanzees, but I digress.

Personally, after spending the day mulling on this, I find the whole thing extremely depressing, for three reasons:

• Despite working at a cloud provider, I see computers as something inherently distributed and personal. There are a lot of latent contradictions here, yes–I’ve learned to live with them.
• As an European citizen, the geopolitics of the asymmetrical situation we are in today regarding technology and AI in general really irk me, and yes, I have learned to deal with that too, but really wish I could do something about it.
• Personally, I can’t afford to keep up. People in startups, self-employed or in very specific minuscule niches might be able to spend enough to do so, but I can’t.

I’m thrifty by nature, usually plan (and over-think) my purchases years in advance, am at a point in my career (and the industry) where job security is hardly a given and already had at least one narrow escape, so saving up every dime I can for a potential rainy day has been very much on my mind and I now agonize over stuff as simple as ordering a 70 EUR battery to revive an eight-year laptop (because, yes, I do still use old machines).

So there is (pardon my French) absolutely no fucking way I am getting decent local inference hardware anytime soon. And I count myself lucky I built borg when I did, even if that was also a painful decision at the time and it is now hopelessly outdated for most things.

That’s it. I’ve vented. Now I’m going to take something for my sinuses, chase it with an antihistamine, and doze off until 4AM tomorrow.

I’ve been building MCP servers for a while now–I wrote about the general approach last year, started out by creating umcp, and I’ve recently opened up an Office server that’s been battered by enough models against enough real documents that the patterns have settled.

Read More...

I have been having feelings about Apple lately. This blog may have drifted a fair way from its original focus on macOS, but I am still, first and foremost, an Apple user – just not an exclusively Apple user, and perhaps not even a particularly obedient one anymore, since I use both Windows and Linux every day and have grown used to judging platforms by what they let me get done rather than by whatever story they are trying to tell about themselves.

Read More...