Now that most of the fuss about Mark Pilgrim's un-switching has died down and that he's made it abundantly clear that he wants to keep his data usable for the next half a century, here's my take on it.
My Life is not in iLife
- I don't do movies. But the current H.264 Open Source efforts seem to be mature enough to encode stuff with, and thanks to the recent boom in video sites there is a lot of interest in editing tools, so if I get around to it, I'll probably have no trouble.
- I don't trust iPhoto with my photos. I never did. I just use it to import, rotate/crop/apply minor tweaks, and then cull the bad ones and dump the good ones in a standard filesystem. Tagging and organizing them is not a priority, but I believe in storing my metadata in my files and know my way around EXIF.
- iTunes is just a (very good) front-end to a DAAP server, as well as a "good enough" ID3 tagging tool. For portuguese CDs that aren't in CDDB, all it takes is drag and drop and some patience.
- All my mail is in an IMAP store - and that includes all my finished documents, which means I only have to index one thing. Storing them as attachments implies some overhead, obviously, but disk space is cheap and the extra metadata from mail headers comes in handy more often than not.
I'm not too concerned about Office documents. Those I write for work are stored at work (and ensuring those are future-proof is not entirely my own concern, although I make a point of generating PDFs and HTML versions of nearly everything), and those I create for personal purposes are few and far between. Other than Excel, I can replace Office with just about anything at a moment's notice.
I've also dabbled in doing some stuff in XML and Flash for generating presentations (instead of S5), but that went nowhere for the simple reason that I don't do presentations off work - even if I did, delivering them usually entails using someone else's computer, and that in turn pretty much mandates the use of PowerPoint.
Maybe I Should...
But let's take the Lemmings who would follow in Mark's footsteps head on, shall we?
Remember my April Fools'? Well, I've been sorely tempted to make it real of late, both due to Mail.app's amazing unreliability and to the fact that I find myself wanting to go fully location-agnostic - i.e., what I really want is a secure server with a very fast and efficient remote desktop protocol and an ultra-slim laptop that I can carry around anywhere.
I don't want to configure my applications more than once. I want to leave a location, travel, arrive at another place and have them pop up on my screen as I left them. I want to leave my laptop behind and connect from another machine, anytime, anywhere.
Yes, I want a cheap, mobile, lightweight Sun Ray (I've ranted about this at length often enough), and the ability to hook up from whatever computer I have to use. Borrowing a Sun motto, I want to have the network be my computer, but with a desktop environment instead of that crufty Web 2.0 junk.
I can already do that with Citrix for my work. Now I want to do it with the rest of my computing life.
As it happens, I am making it happen now, using Linux, Gnome and an UMTS connection from my M100. And it rocks - I am typing this in the Gnome editor inside a 16-bit VNC desktop, and it's more than fast enough to keep up, even inside an SSH wrapper.
So what's the hangup?
Maybe I Shouldn't...
The fundamental thing keeping me back is that Mac OS X provides such a damn good desktop experience that I can't see myself letting go of it anytime soon. No matter how good Gnome is right now, I still find myself grappling with the usability issues (and eyesores) of Gnome (or worse, KDE) applications on a regular basis.
It's not just the aesthetical aspects, it's also the integration (or lack of) between the applications themselves and the operating system, as well as the ad-hoc nature of what passes for UI consistency in those environments.
Plus there is no shortage of things that I simply love on Mac OS X that add up to the long list of nearly intangible niceties that make up the Mac experience - and most of them happen to be free, built in to the OS, or tremendously effective through leveraging Mac OS X-specific features.
Things like Quicksilver (which is, for me, the quintessential Mac OS X experience), iSync, Adium (and its great Address Book integration), VoodooPad Lite, Growl, you name it. There's no shortage of useful stuff out there.
And they all just work. There are some particularly annoying repeat offenders like Mail.app, mind you, but the truth is that there are very few Linux (or Windows) applications that match the average degree of quality and polish of Mac software.
There is the occasional trouble when trying to compile something that is badly packaged or that doesn't take portability into account (as a lot of Linux-centric Open Source projects happen to do), but I end up chasing about the same number of dependencies and obscure libraries as I used to do under Fedora.
Choosing your own hardware, now that's something that struck home, given my interest in getting hold of a MacBook when the kinks are ironed out. It's an investment in technology, and I am extremely picky about any sort of investment that significantly devalues after less than a year (as all computers do), so I've been looking wistfully at "regular" laptops as well.
Ignoring the usual annoyances associated with being a Mac user outside the US, I find the (oft-cited) argument of Apple hardware being too expensive to be complete nonsense. I can't find a decent laptop to match the MacBook on both features and price, and especially not when I throw in the degree of hardware/software integration only Apple can deliver right now.
So although I've been tinkering with the idea of picking up a Toshiba R100 secondhand (which would be more than enough to make my Network Computing vision come true), the only reason I even consider that option (besides liking that particular machine) is that I know my way around Toshiba hardware.
Besides, I can't help but feel that Mark's timing was a bit off. Sure, once installed Linux doesn't go wonky like XP (unless you're the adventurous kernel-upgrading type), but every time I install Linux on a laptop I feel like I was back in the early 386BSD days, digging up obscure patches just to get it to run, deal with power management, etc., etc.
All The Best, Mark.
Still, he's sure to be able to pull it off successfully. For starters, he's bought a desktop, which is sure to go a long way towards lessening any hardware-related issues.
But, honestly, anyone with an ICBM meta-tag on his site and an X-Status: It's hard to find a new hobby. on his HTTP headers is sure to not only know his way around technology, but also enjoy tinkering about with Linux until it runs flawlessly on his new Lenovo.
Let's just keep in mind that it was his personal choice and stop annoying him, shall we?